Jan Vishwas 2026: Key Decriminalisation Reforms

Decriminalisation Push via Jan Vishwas Bill 2026

Why in the News ?

The government introduced the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha, aiming to decriminalise minor offences, rationalise penalties, and improve ease of doing business. The Bill has sparked debate over its constitutional and administrative implications.

Jan Vishwas 2026: Key Decriminalisation Reforms

Key Provisions and Objectives of the Bill:

  • The Bill seeks to amend 79 Central Acts across 23 ministries, targeting outdated and redundant provisions.
  • Out of 784 provisions, around 717 are proposed for decriminalisation, replacing imprisonment with monetary penalties.
  • Around 67 provisions aim at improving ease of living, reflecting a citizen-centric governance approach.
  • Focus is on procedural and minor offences, ensuring that serious violations remain unaffected.
  • The overall objective is to enhance regulatory efficiency, reduce litigation, and promote a business-friendly environment.

Major Sectoral Reforms Introduced

  • Motor Vehicles Act: Introduces a 30-day grace period post expiry of driving licence, easing compliance burden.
  • Electricity Act: Removes imprisonment for non-compliance, increasing penalties up to ₹10 lakh instead.
  • Cattle Trespass Act (1871): Decriminalises offences, expands definition of cattle to include multiple animals, and directs fines towards animal welfare.
  • NDMC Act, 1994: Revamps property tax structure into building tax and vacant land tax.
  • Delhi Development Act, 1957: Rationalises penalties related to urban planning violations under DDA.

About Decriminalisation and Regulatory Reforms:

●  Decriminalisation: Process of removing criminal penalties (like imprisonment) for certain offences and replacing them with civil penalties (fines).

●  Linked with Ease of Doing Business (EoDB) reforms to reduce compliance burden and fear of prosecution.

●  Aligns with global practices where minor economic offences are treated as civil violations.

●  Helps reduce judicial backlog and administrative burden on courts.

●  However, concerns include risks of regulatory dilution, corruption, and weakening of deterrence.