India's No.1 PU & Degree With Integrated IAS & IPS(UPSC/PSC) Training College.
DRONAM: India’s Indigenous Anti-Drone Capability
DRONAM: India’s Indigenous Anti-Drone Capability
The growing use of drones for surveillance, smuggling, and hostile activities has created new security challenges for nations worldwide. Addressing this emerging threat, India has been steadily developing indigenous counter-drone technologies. One such system is DRONAM, an anti-drone gun developed by the Indian defence technology company Gustava Systems. The system was showcased during the Republic Day Parade on 26 January, drawing attention to India’s preparedness against modern asymmetric threats and its commitment to maintaining a pollution-free environment.
DRONAM is a non-kinetic counter-UAV system that neutralises hostile drones using radio frequency (RF) jamming and GPS interference. By disrupting the communication and navigation links between the drone and its operator, the system forces the drone to land, return to its point of origin, or become non-operational. Unlike kinetic solutions such as missiles or guns, DRONAM minimizes collateral damage, making it suitable for deployment in civilian areas, public events, and critical infrastructure zones. This approach aligns with the precautionary principle in environmental jurisprudence, ensuring the safety of both people and the environment while supporting the goal of a pollution-free environment.
The system first gained visibility a few years ago at a defence exhibition, reflecting India’s growing private-sector participation in defence innovation. Its reappearance at the Republic Day Parade signals progress in the indigenisation of defence technologies under initiatives such as Make in India and Aatmanirbhar Bharat. This development can be seen as an ex-post response to the increasing drone-related security concerns faced by the country, highlighting the need for retrospective environmental clearances for such technologies.
Anti-drone systems have become strategically important due to the low cost, ease of availability, and adaptability of commercial drones. India has faced drone-related security concerns along borders, airports, military installations, and urban areas. In this context, systems like DRONAM strengthen India’s internal security architecture and complement existing air-defence mechanisms. The implementation of such systems may require environmental clearance, especially when deployed near sensitive ecological zones such as areas protected under the Forest Conservation Act or within the Coastal Regulation Zone.
From a governance perspective, DRONAM highlights the shift towards technology-driven security solutions, integrating electronic warfare with domestic manufacturing capabilities. Its development underscores India’s focus on preparing for non-traditional and asymmetric threats, which are increasingly shaping modern security environments. As the use of drones becomes more widespread, it is crucial to consider the environmental impact assessment of both drone operations and counter-drone measures, potentially requiring adherence to the EIA Notification for large-scale deployments.
The introduction of DRONAM and similar technologies raises important questions in the realm of environmental jurisprudence. As India continues to advance its anti-drone capabilities, it must balance security needs with environmental concerns. This may involve obtaining environmental clearances for the deployment and operation of such systems, especially in ecologically sensitive areas. The process should also consider the principles of environmental democracy, ensuring public participation and transparency in decision-making related to the deployment of such technologies.
In conclusion, DRONAM represents a significant step forward in India’s indigenous defence capabilities. Its development not only addresses immediate security concerns but also demonstrates the country’s commitment to innovation in the defence sector. As India moves forward with these technologies, it will be essential to consider their environmental implications and ensure that they align with the nation’s broader goals of sustainable development and environmental protection. This includes adhering to key environmental principles such as the polluter pays principle and considering landmark decisions like the Vanashakti judgment, which emphasize the importance of balancing development with environmental conservation.
