Gujarat UCC Bill Tabled in Assembly
Gujarat Introduces Uniform Civil Code Bill In Assembly
Why in the News ?
The Gujarat government has introduced the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Bill, 2026 in the Assembly, proposing a common legal framework for personal laws, making Gujarat the second State after Uttarakhand to move towards implementing a UCC.
Key Provisions of Gujarat UCC Bill 2026:
- The Gujarat Uniform Civil Code Bill, 2026 was tabled by Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel in the State Assembly.
- It aims to establish a uniform legal framework governing marriage, divorce, succession, and live-in relationships across all religions.
- The law will apply to all residents of Gujarat, including those residing outside the State.
- It introduces mandatory registration of live-in relationships and requires formal declaration for their termination.
- The Bill seeks to eliminate legal disparities arising from religion-based personal laws.
- It is based on recommendations of a State-appointed expert committee.
- The legislation promotes legal uniformity and gender justice in personal matters.
Scope, Exemptions and Implications
- The provisions of the Bill will not apply to Scheduled Tribes (STs) and certain groups with constitutionally protected customary practices.
- This reflects a balance between uniformity and protection of indigenous traditions.
- If passed, Gujarat will become the second State after Uttarakhand to implement a UCC.
- The move is seen as a step towards fulfilling the Directive Principles of State Policy.
- It may lead to debates on religious freedom vs legal uniformity.
- The Bill is expected to impact family law systems, especially regarding marriage and inheritance.
- Critics may raise concerns about cultural diversity and minority rights.
About Uniform Civil Code:● Article 44 (DPSP): Directs the State to secure a Uniform Civil Code for all citizens. ● UCC Objective: Replace personal laws based on religion with a common civil law. ● Covers areas like marriage, divorce, adoption, inheritance. ● Challenges: Balancing secularism, diversity, and fundamental rights (Articles 25-28). ● Supreme Court Observations: Repeatedly emphasised need for UCC in cases like Shah Bano (1985). ● Reflects ongoing debate between legal uniformity and cultural pluralism. |

