• UGI USER
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • 7 Likes
  • 0 Comments

WHY INDIA NEEDS A THIRD AIRCRAFT CARRIER

Syllabus:

GS-3:

  • Various Security Forces and Agencies and their Mandate.
  • Security Challenges and Their Management in Border Areas: Linkages of Organized Crime with Terrorism

GS-2:

Indigenization of Technology

Focus:

Recent reports indicate that Cochin Shipyard Limited (CSL) is set to begin construction of a new Vikrant-class 40,000-tonne platform, advancing the Indian Navy’s long-standing demand for a third aircraft

carrier to bolster its maritime capabilities and retain shipbuilding expertise.

  • Operational Requirement: Ensures one carrier per seaboard and one in reserve.
  • Avoid Skill Depletion: Maintains CSL’s carrier-building expertise.
  • Strategic Deterrence: Counters China’s A2/AD threats.
  • Sea Control: Enhances power projection with carrier battle groups.
  • Geopolitical Presence: Strengthens Indian Ocean Region influence.
  • Capability Upgrades: IAC-2 offers advanced features and greater local content.
source:ssbcrack

Understanding the Long-Standing Demand and Strategic Importance:

  • Imminent Construction: Recent media reports indicate that Cochin Shipyard Limited (CSL) is set to begin constructing a new Vikrant-class 40,000-tonne platform, moving closer to fulfilling the Indian Navy’s long-standing demand for a third aircraft carrier.
  • Expertise Retention: Building the Indigenous Aircraft Carrier-2 (IAC-2) aims to prevent the dissipation of CSL’s carrier-building expertise, ensuring continuous development and modernization.
  • Historical Lessons: The navy is conscious of avoiding the ‘lost decade’ (1995-2005) when Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders (MDL) submarine building skills were neglected, leading to costly reconstruction efforts later.
  • Strategic Necessity: The third carrier will complement the existing INS Vikramaditya and INS Vikrant, fulfilling the navy’s requirement for one carrier per seaboard and one in reserve.
  • Preventing Skill Decay: Continuous construction and upgrades will maintain the shipbuilding capabilities of CSL, crucial for long-term naval strength.
Key Features of Indian Aircraft Carriers:

About INS Vikrant:

  • Origin: Name from India’s first aircraft carrier, played a key role in 1971 War, decommissioned in 1997.
  • Design & Development: By Indian Navy’s WDB, built by Cochin Shipyard Limited.
  • Operational Capability: Operates 30 aircraft, including MiG-29K, Kamov-31, MH-60R, ALH, and LCA (Navy).
  • Military Instrument: Projects air power for offensive, interdiction, anti-surface, counter-air, anti-submarine, and early warning.

About INS Vikramaditya:

  • Origin: Formerly Russia’s Admiral Gorshkov.
  • Induction: Integrated into Indian Navy on November 16, 2013.
  • Size: Length 285m, width 60m, height 60m.
  • Capacity: Houses 1,600 personnel, carries 30 aircraft (MiG 29K fighters, Kamov helicopters).
  • Systems: Equipped with advanced LUNA and DAPS launch/recovery systems.

Size and Speed:

  • INS Vikrant:
  • Weighs around 43,000 tonnes and is 262 meters long.
  • Prioritizes maneuverability with a top speed of 28 knots.

INS Vikramaditya:

  • Slightly larger, weighing around 44,500 tonnes and measuring 284 meters in length.
  • Can reach speeds of up to 30 knots.

Firepower and Flexibility:

Both carriers:

  • Carry MiG-29K fighter jets for air defense and ground attack.
  • Operate Kamov-31 helicopters for airborne early warning.
  • Include MH-60R helicopters for multi-role operations.
  • Utilize indigenously built Advanced Light Helicopters (ALH) for utility tasks.

Modernity and Innovation:

INS Vikrant:

  • Incorporates the latest advancements in design, sensors, and electronics.
  • Features a new combat management system for superior situational awareness and operational efficiency.
  • Utilizes the STOBAR (Short Take-Off but Arrested Recovery) method.

INS Vikramaditya:

  • Modernized but uses older technology.

India’s Future Plans:

  • Carrier Battle Groups:
  • Plans to establish four aircraft carrier battle groups (CBGs) to strengthen naval presence.

Fleet Expansion:

  • The 15-year plan includes four fleet carriers and two light fleet carriers.
  • New indigenous aircraft carrier, INS Vishal (IAC-3), to be built at Cochin Shipyard, similar to INS Vikrant.

Key Facts about INS Vishal:

  • Displacement: 65,000 tonnes.
  • Launch System: CATOBAR.
  • Engines: Four GE LM2500+ gas turbines.
  • Speed/Range: 28 knots, 7,500 nautical miles.
  • Aircraft: Mix of fixed-wing and rotary-wing.
  • Capability: Enhanced naval operations and AEW.

What is the Blue-Water Navy?

  • Global Operation: Capable of operating across open oceans.
  • Power Projection: Projects power far from home country.
  • Sustained Operations: Maintains prolonged presence in deep waters.
  • Aircraft Carriers: Typically includes one or more carriers.
  • Comparison: Contrasts with brown-water and green-water navies.

Future Concerns and Operational Challenges:

  • Cost and Efficacy: The debate over IAC-2 involves concerns about its high cost ($5-6 billion) and its effectiveness amidst the anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities developed by China and Pakistan.
  • Technological Advancements: Advances in cruise missile technology have made A2/AD strategies more accessible and effective, posing significant threats to carrier operations.
  • Global Comparisons: Even the U.S. Navy views China’s A2/AD strategy as a serious threat, indicating the high level of challenge for any naval power.
  • Strategic Divisions: Within the Indian Navy, there is a split opinion between pursuing a ‘sea denial’ strategy with submarines or a ‘sea control’ strategy with carrier battle groups.
  • Resource Allocation: Some argue that the funds for a new carrier could be better spent on additional submarines (SSKs), critical surface combatants, and other essential naval equipment.

Financial Constraints and Prioritization:

  • Revised Goals: Financial constraints have forced the Indian Navy to revise its goal of operating 200 assorted warships by 2027 as per the Maritime Capability Perspective Plan (MCPP).
  • Reduced Demands: Fiscal shortages have also led to reduced demands for mine counter-measures and long-range maritime aircraft.
  • Inter-Service Competition: The Indian Air Force (IAF) and Indian Army compete for a larger share of the limited defense budget, impacting the navy’s funding.
  • IAF’s Perspective: Some IAF veterans view the aircraft carrier as a costly indulgence vulnerable to A2/AD threats, suggesting alternatives like enhanced maritime strike fighters.
  • Alternative Solutions: The IAF’s SEPECAT Jaguar IM/IS and Su-30MKI fighters, with upgraded maritime strike capabilities, are seen as more economical and secure options for power projection.

Upgrading Capabilities and Alternative Strategies:

  • Enhanced Fighter Squadrons: The IAF has commissioned Su-30MKI squadrons equipped with BrahMos-A supersonic cruise missiles, enhancing maritime engagement capabilities.
  • Maritime Strike Efficiency: Upgraded Jaguars armed with AGM-84L Block II Harpoon missiles and advanced radar systems offer potent maritime strike options.
  • Andaman and Nicobar Upgrades: Some naval strategists advocate for enhancing the military capabilities of the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago to create an A2/AD maritime ‘exclusive zone’.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Upgrading the archipelago’s defenses is seen as a cheaper and more permanent alternative to building a new aircraft carrier.
  • Strategic Location: The archipelago’s strategic location makes it an unsinkable asset for monitoring and deterring Chinese naval activities in the Indian Ocean Region.

Way Forward:

  • Strategic Assessment: Conduct a comprehensive strategic assessment to evaluate the necessity and potential impact of a third aircraft carrier in the context of India’s maritime security and regional power projection.
  • Resource Allocation: Prioritize efficient allocation of financial resources to ensure that the development of the IAC-2 does not compromise the funding for other critical naval assets such as submarines, surface combatants, and naval utility helicopters.
  • Technological Advancements: Integrate cutting-edge technologies into the design and construction of IAC-2, including advanced radar systems, missile defense capabilities, and enhanced electronic warfare systems to counter A2/AD threats.
  • International Collaboration: Explore international partnerships for technology transfer, joint exercises, and operational training to enhance the carrier’s capabilities and ensure interoperability with allied navies.
  • Capability Development: Focus on developing indigenous capabilities in carrier construction and maintenance to reduce dependence on foreign suppliers and foster self-reliance in defense manufacturing.
  • Balanced Fleet Composition: Maintain a balanced fleet composition by concurrently investing in submarines, corvettes, destroyers, and other surface vessels to ensure a versatile and resilient navy.
  • Regional Cooperation: Strengthen regional maritime cooperation with neighboring countries and allies to enhance collective security, share intelligence, and conduct joint maritime operations to safeguard strategic interests in the Indian Ocean Region.

Conclusion: Strategic Necessity vs. Financial Pragmatism

  • Balanced Approach: While the construction of IAC-2 is strategically important, it must be balanced with other critical needs of the navy and the broader defense requirements.
  • Future Readiness: Ensuring that CSL’s carrier-building expertise is maintained is crucial for future naval capabilities and readiness.
  • Resource Optimization: The debate highlights the need for careful allocation of resources to balance carrier development with other essential naval assets.
  • Strategic Autonomy: Maintaining a strong and capable navy is vital for India’s strategic autonomy and its ability to project power in the region.
  • National Security: Ultimately, the decision to build a third aircraft carrier should be guided by comprehensive national security considerations and long-term strategic interests.

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/why-india-needs-a-third-aircraft-carrier/article68273426.ece#:~:text=IAF%20veterans%20reasoned%20that%20under,to%20formidable%20A2%2FAD%20threats.

Mains Practice Question:

Discuss the strategic importance of a third aircraft carrier for the Indian Navy in the context of regional security and operational capabilities. How do financial constraints and evolving military technologies influence this decision? (250 words)

Associated Article: