SC REFUSES TO STAY NEW LAW EXCLUDING CJI FROM PANEL PICKING CEC, ECS
Why in the news?
- Congress leaders Jaya Thakur and Sanjay Meshram filed a plea seeking an interim stay on the new law excluding the Chief Justice of India (CJI) from the panel selecting the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and election commissioners (ECs).
- The Supreme Court, presided by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, declined the request for an interim stay of the new law.
- The bench issued notice on the plea and refused to stay the statute, emphasizing its inability to do so.
Challenges to New Law:
- The new law excludes the CJI from the selection panel for the CEC and ECs.
- Congress leaders argued that the law lacks an “independent mechanism” for appointing Election Commission of India members, violating the principle of free and fair elections.
- Violation of Separation of Powers:
- Senior Advocate Vikas Singh argued that the new law goes against the concept of separation of powers. He referred to a March 2, 2023, Constitution bench ruling directing the CEC and ECs’ appointment on the advice of a committee comprising the Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and the CJI.
- Constitutional Challenge:
- Article 324(2) of the Constitution empowers the President, with aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, to appoint the CEC and ECs.
- The new law, The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, excludes the CJI from the selection process.
- Dilution of Previous Supreme Court Judgment:
- The petitioners argued that the new law dilutes a 2023 Supreme Court five-judge bench ruling restricting the government’s power to appoint CEC and ECs.
- The exclusion of the CJI from the selection process was deemed contradictory to the previous Supreme Court judgment.
Importance of Transparent Appointment Procedure:
- The petition emphasized the significance of fairness and transparency in appointing the Chief Election Commissioner and its members.
- The functioning of the Election Commission significantly impacts the quality of governance and the strength of democracy.
Criticism of Supreme Court Ruling:
- Former Union Law Minister Ashwani Kumar criticized the Supreme Court ruling on the selection of election commissioners, deeming some of its judgments disappointing.
- Kumar expressed disagreement with the judgment, asserting that it virtually rewrote the Constitution and conflicted with the will of Parliament.
Next Hearing in April:
- The court scheduled the next hearing on the matter for April.