Far-Right vs Judiciary: Europe’s Rule of Law Clash

Far-Right vs Judiciary: Europe’s Rule of Law Clash

Why in the News ?

Recent court rulings against far-right leaders in France, Romania, and Germany have triggered allegations of political targeting and sparked debates on judicial independence. These cases reflect growing tension between conservative-nationalist forces and the democratic institutions of the European Union.

Key Cases Escalating the Conflict:

• In France, Marine Le Pen was convicted for EU fund embezzlement, receiving a four-year sentence and a five-year political ban.
• In Romania, Călin Georgescu was barred from re-running for President due to anti-democratic actions and suspected foreign ties.
• In Germany, the AfD party was labeled a threat to democracy by the intelligence agency (BfV), leading to surveillance and internal restructuring.

Political Reactions and Allegations

• Le Pen and her allies called the verdict a “political witch hunt”; an appeal is set for 2026.
• Viktor Orbán and Matteo Salvini voiced support, echoing claims of establishment bias.
• AfD dissolved its youth wing to counter the extremist tag and resist a potential ban.

Impact on EU Democracy and Rule of Law

• Critics argue courts are being used to silence opposition; others see the judiciary as a defender of democracy.
• Concerns over foreign interference, especially Russia, deepen the distrust.
• Rising populism and declining institutional trust threaten democratic stability across the EU.