What's New

ECONOMIC PLANNING IN INDIA

Introduction

The Context of Independence

In 1947, when the British colonial rule came to an end in India, the nation was left to chart its own course toward development and prosperity. The end of colonialism brought about a sense of freedom and autonomy; however, it also unveiled the multitude of challenges that lay ahead for the newly independent state. This era marked a pivotal point in India’s history, signifying both an end and a beginning—an end to foreign dominion and the beginning of self-governance and rebuilding.

The Challenges Post-Independence

As the British departed, they left behind a country fraught with numerous socio-economic issues. Among the foremost challenges were:

• Mass Poverty: A significant portion of India’s population lived in dire poverty, lacking basic necessities and access to resources.
• Food Shortage: The agricultural sector, underdeveloped and exploited during the colonial era, was inadequate to meet the food demands of the nation’s vast population, leading to widespread hunger and malnutrition.
• Inflation: The economy faced severe inflationary pressures, further exacerbating the cost of living and diminishing the purchasing power of the average citizen.
• Illiteracy: A large majority of the population was illiterate, hindering social and economic progress and leaving many unable to partake in the benefits of development.
• Lack of Healthcare: Access to healthcare was limited, with inadequate infrastructure and resources to address the health needs of the population.
• Infrastructure Deficit: The lack of well-developed infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and public utilities, impeded economic growth and the delivery of essential services.

MEANING OF PLANNING

The Strategy for Development: Planning

In response to these daunting challenges, the Indian government recognized that a structured and strategic approach was necessary to steer the nation toward sustainable development and economic prosperity. The solution lay in adopting a model of planned economic development. This approach was aimed at addressing the multi-faceted issues through coordinated efforts and prioritized initiatives, focusing on sectors critical for national progress such as agriculture, industry, education, and healthcare.

Planning was seen as a means to:

• Mobilize and allocate resources efficiently.
• Foster industrialization and reduce dependence on agriculture.
• Improve literacy rates and healthcare coverage.
• Build necessary infrastructure to support economic and social development.

This strategy entailed the formulation of Five-Year Plans, which were to be implemented by the Planning Commission, an institution specifically established for this purpose. Each plan was designed with specific targets and objectives, aiming for holistic development that would eventually alleviate poverty, improve living standards, and propel India toward becoming a self-reliant and prosperous nation.

Understanding Economic Planning in India:

Economic planning in India has been a critical instrument in guiding the country’s development trajectory since its independence. The process of planning involves the systematic and strategic allocation of resources to achieve specific short-term and long-term goals. This approach is fundamental in managing a nation’s resources efficiently, aiming for sustainable growth and development across various sectors.

The Genesis of Economic Planning in India

At the dawn of independence, India faced immense challenges, including poverty, illiteracy, and a fragile economy. The leadership recognized the urgent need for a structured framework to utilize the nation’s resources judiciously. This realization underscored the importance of planning in charting the course of India’s economic and social development.

Visvesvaraya: The Forerunner of Economic Planning

Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya, a visionary engineer and statesman, is celebrated as a precursor to economic planning in India. His seminal work, “India’s Plan for the Economy,” published in 1934, laid the groundwork for systematic economic planning. Visvesvaraya proposed a ten-year plan envisioning an investment of Rs. 1000 crore, an ambitious blueprint aimed at revitalizing the Indian economy through strategic resource allocation and infrastructure development.

Post-Independence Economic Policy and the Establishment of the Planning Commission

The Industrial Policy Statement of 1948, released shortly after India gained independence, was a critical document that outlined the nation’s economic strategy. It advocated for the establishment of a Planning Commission, signaling a commitment to structured economic planning. The document also endorsed a mixed economic model, combining elements of capitalism and socialism, to guide India’s developmental path. This approach was aimed at achieving a balance between state intervention and market freedom, thereby ensuring equitable growth and development.

The Advent of Five-Year Plans

The formal initiation of economic planning in India began with the establishment of the Planning Commission in 1950. The Commission was tasked with formulating five-year plans, a concept inspired by the Soviet Union’s approach to economic development. These plans were designed as comprehensive blueprints, encompassing various sectors of the economy such as agriculture, industry, transport, and education, among others. Each plan aimed to address specific challenges and set achievable targets for economic growth and societal advancement.

TYPES OF PLANNING

Planning is a critical function in the management and development of a country or organization, enabling it to navigate towards its goals efficiently and effectively. There are several types of planning, each suited to different contexts, ideologies, and objectives. These can be broadly categorized into directional, perspective, indicative, imperative, centralized, and decentralized planning.

Directional Planning

Directional planning is adopted by countries that adhere to socialist ideals. It involves a strategic approach where the distribution of resources is equal, and the control over major sectors such as finance, industry, transport, and infrastructure lies with the state.

Characteristics:

• Equal distribution of resources.
• State control over key economic sectors.
• Focus on social welfare and equitable growth.

Applications: Primarily used in socialist countries where the government aims to manage the economy actively to prevent inequalities.

Example: The Soviet Union is a historic example where directional planning was a cornerstone of its economic system, aiming for equitable development across the nation.

Perspective Planning

Perspective planning is a long-term approach, covering a period of 20 to 25 years. It allows for a gradual development process to achieve specific targets through phased implementation.

Characteristics:

• Long-term vision (20-25 years).
• Divided into short-term (5 years) and long-term phases.
• Aims at sustained development by setting achievable milestones.

Applications: Suitable for countries or organizations with long-term development goals that require sustained efforts over decades.

Examples: Not specified, but many developing countries adopt perspective planning to guide their economic development and infrastructure expansion.

Indicative Planning

Indicative planning operates on a decentralized principle, setting targets that are mandatory for the public sector and indicative for the private sector.

Characteristics:

• Combination of mandatory public sector targets and suggestive targets for the private sector.
• Encourages private sector participation in national development plans.
• Decentralized approach to planning.

Applications: Utilized in mixed economies where both public and private sectors play significant roles in development.

Examples: France and Japan have successfully used indicative planning to guide their economic growth, blending state directives with market mechanisms.

Imperative Planning

Definition: Imperative planning entails complete government control over economic activities and resources, focusing on the efficient use of resources to meet set targets.

Characteristics:

• Total government control and centralization.
• Rigid decision-making and policy implementation processes.
• Lack of alternative options for market players.

Applications: Adopted in countries with strong central governments that prioritize control over economic direction and resource allocation.

Examples: Russia and China have historically implemented imperative planning to direct their economic and industrial policies.

Centralized Planning

Definition: Centralized planning involves central authorities in framing and formulating plans for various sectors and industries, taking major investment decisions based on set goals.

Characteristics:

• Central authority-driven.
• Uniformity in plan formulation and implementation.
• Major decisions and investments directed by central plans.

Applications: Applicable in economies where central control is deemed necessary for coherent and unified development across sectors.

Examples: Not specified, but typically seen in socialist or highly centralized economies.

Decentralized Planning

Definition: In decentralized planning, plans are communicated to grassroots levels and move through a hierarchy, allowing for involvement from stakeholders at all levels.

Characteristics:

• Grassroots involvement in planning.
• Hierarchical dissemination of decisions.
• Engagement of stakeholders from various sectors.

Applications: Effective in democratic settings where local inputs and needs are considered important for the overall planning process.

Examples: Decentralized planning is often seen in democratic countries where local governance structures have a say in the development process, tailoring plans to meet local needs and conditions.

Each type of planning offers unique advantages and faces distinct challenges, tailored to the specific economic, political, and social contexts within which they are implemented.

MULTI-LEVEL PLANNING

Multi-Level Planning (MLP) in India is a strategic approach designed to decentralize planning processes, enabling various administrative levels to participate actively in the development and implementation of plans tailored to their unique needs and contexts. This approach emerged as part of a broader initiative to promote inclusive and balanced regional development across the country. By delegating planning authority and responsibilities to different governmental levels, MLP fosters a more participatory and responsive planning framework.

INDIAN ECONOMIC PLANNING BEFORE AND AFTER INDEPENDENCE

Pre-Independence Economic Plans

Visvesvaraya’s Plan (1934)

• Origin: In his book “Planned Economy for India,” M. Visvesvaraya, an acclaimed engineer and statesman, articulated the first structured plan for India’s development over a decade.
• Objective: The primary goal was to transition the workforce from agriculture to industrial sectors, aiming to double the national income within ten years. This vision marked a pioneering effort towards formal economic planning in India.

National Planning Committee (1938)

• Formation: Initiated by Subhash Chandra Bose, then President of the Indian National Congress, this committee represented India’s first concerted effort to craft a national-level plan.
• Purpose: The committee’s aim was to outline a comprehensive development strategy for the country, integrating various economic sectors and regions.

Bombay Plan (1944)

• Contributors: Prominent industrialists of Bombay, including JRD Tata, GD Birla, and others, collaboratively developed “A Plan of Economic Development for India,” famously known as the Bombay Plan.
• Goals: The plan aimed to double the per capita income over fifteen years and significantly boost the national income, focusing on industrial growth alongside agricultural improvement.

M N Roy’s People’s Plan

• Ideology: Rooted in Marxist socialism, this plan was proposed by M N Roy, focusing on a 10-year development horizon.
• Focus Areas: It prioritized agricultural production and advocated for the nationalization of all agricultural lands, reflecting a strong emphasis on socialist principles for economic development.

Gandhian Plan (1944)

• Proposer: Formulated by Sri Shriman Narayan, the Gandhian Plan emphasized economic decentralization, advocating for the growth of rural areas through the development of cottage industries.
• Philosophy: Inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s vision, the plan stressed self-sufficiency and grassroots development, aligning with Gandhian principles of economic activity.

Sarvodaya Plan (1950)

• Architect: Inspired by the Gandhian Plan and Vinoba Bhave’s Sarvodaya concept, Jaiprakash Narayan drafted this plan.
• Key Elements: It focused on the development of agriculture and small-scale cotton industries, promoting land reform and decentralized participatory planning to achieve inclusive growth.

Post-Independence Economic Plans

Economic Programme Committee (EPC) (1948)

• Establishment: Formed by the All India Congress Committee (AICC), this committee aimed at crafting a balanced economic strategy for post-independence India.
• Objective: The EPC sought to establish a symbiotic relationship between private and public sectors and between urban and rural economies, setting the stage for holistic national development.

Planning Commission (1950)

• Inception: Established by the Government of India, the Planning Commission was tasked with a critical role in shaping the country’s economic future.
• Mission: Its mandate included assessing resource availability, formulating strategic plans for resource utilization, and setting priorities to ensure balanced and effective development across sectors.

GOALS OF 5-YEAR PLANS

The Five-Year Plans are a series of government-led initiatives aimed at developing the economy of a country through carefully planned economic goals. These plans typically focus on various sectors of the economy, including agriculture, industry, services, and infrastructure, with the aim of improving the country’s economic performance and the quality of life of its citizens. The goals of these plans can be categorized into four main areas: Growth, Modernization, Self-Reliance, and Equity.

Growth

Modernization

Self-Reliance

Equity

The implementation of these goals through Five-Year Plans represents a comprehensive approach to national development. By focusing on growth, modernization, self-reliance, and equity, the plans aim to create a more prosperous, modern, independent, and equitable society. Each of these objectives contributes to the overarching goal of improving the standard of living for the entire population, while also laying down a solid foundation for sustainable development in the future.

NEED FOR THE PLANNING

he necessity for planning in any organization, project, or endeavor is pivotal for several reasons. Planning provides a structured approach to reaching goals, utilizing resources efficiently, and ensuring that activities are directed toward achieving set objectives.

Goals and Vision

• Purpose: The primary purpose of planning is to establish clear, achievable goals that align with the overarching vision of an organization or project.
• Direction: It sets a direction for the efforts and activities of all members involved, ensuring that their work is coherent and synergistic towards the common objectives.
• Focus: Planning helps maintain focus on long-term goals while navigating through short-term operational challenges, thereby ensuring consistent progress.

Means and Ways

• Efficiency: The essence of planning lies in devising the most effective and efficient means and ways to utilize available resources, including time, money, and human skills, to meet the targets.
• Strategizing: It involves strategizing the steps and methodologies that will be employed in the process of reaching the set goals. This includes prioritizing tasks, allocating resources, and setting timelines.
• Optimization: By planning, organizations can optimize their operations and processes, leading to better productivity and reduced redundancies.

Resources Mobilization

• Allocation: Effective planning ensures the appropriate allocation of resources to various tasks and projects based on their priority and necessity. This strategic allocation helps in avoiding resource constraints and bottlenecks.
• Utilization: It focuses on the optimal utilization of resources, ensuring that each resource is used to its maximum potential and in alignment with the objectives.
• Monitoring: Planning encompasses monitoring the mobilization and utilization of resources, enabling adjustments and reallocations as necessary to adhere to the plan.

Prudent Expenses

• Cost Estimation: One of the critical components of planning is making an accurate estimation of expenses. This estimation helps in budgeting and ensuring that the financial resources are allocated efficiently.
• Cost Minimization: Through careful planning, unnecessary expenditures can be minimized, leading to cost savings. It involves identifying cost-effective approaches without compromising the quality and success of the project.
• Optimal Utilization: Ensuring that every dollar spent contributes to the achievement of the project goals, planning helps in achieving targets on time and within budget, maximizing the return on investment.

OBJECTIVES OF PLANNING

The planning framework in India, designed with the vision of achieving a welfare state, encompasses a broad range of socio-economic goals. These objectives are tailored to steer the country towards comprehensive development, addressing core issues like poverty, unemployment, and regional disparities.

Economic Modernisation and Stability

Objective: To transform and upgrade the economic structure and its mechanisms to a more advanced state, ensuring economic stability.

Strategies:

• Technological advancement in key sectors.
• Strengthening financial institutions for better economic management.
• Policies aimed at controlling inflation and ensuring fiscal discipline.

Reduction of Inequalities

Objective: To narrow the gap between different socio-economic groups and regions.

Strategies:

• Implementing progressive taxation to redistribute wealth.
• Developing policies that target upliftment of the underprivileged sections of society.
• Ensuring equitable access to resources and opportunities across different regions.

Enhancement of Standard of Living

Objective: To improve the overall quality of life for the populace through better healthcare, education, and housing.

Strategies:

• Expanding public health and education services.
• Infrastructure development that supports better living conditions.
• Enhancing social security measures for the vulnerable.

Economic Growth and Development

Objective: To achieve a higher rate of economic growth that is both sustainable and inclusive.

Strategies:

• Diversifying the economic base and promoting high-growth sectors.
• Encouraging investments in sustainable technologies and practices.
• Fostering an environment that supports innovation and entrepreneurship.

Sustainable and Inclusive Growth

Objective: To ensure that economic growth benefits all sections of society and does not compromise the environment.

Strategies:

• Integrating environmental considerations into development plans.
• Promoting green technologies and renewable energy sources.
• Developing social inclusion policies that ensure no group is left behind.

Self-sufficiency and Employment Generation

Objective: To reduce dependence on imports by boosting domestic production and creating ample employment opportunities.

Strategies:

• Promoting industries that have the potential to replace imports with domestic products.
• Implementing employment schemes in rural and urban areas.
• Encouraging skill development and vocational training to match job market needs.

Regional Development

Objective: To address regional imbalances by promoting equitable development across all regions.

Strategies:

• Allocating resources to develop infrastructure in underdeveloped regions.
• Supporting regional industries and agriculture to stimulate local economies.
• Implementing special area development programs for backward regions.

Poverty Eradication and Social Justice

Objective: To alleviate poverty and ensure social justice for all citizens.

Strategies:

• Launching targeted poverty alleviation programs.
• Ensuring access to basic services for the poor.
• Promoting policies that favor the redistribution of wealth and opportunities.

Modernization of the Economy

Objective: To modernize the agricultural sector and the overall economy through technological advancements and expansion.

Strategies:

• Introducing modern farming techniques and high-yield crops.
• Encouraging the adoption of new technologies in industrial production.
• Fostering research and development in key economic sectors.

Technological Advancement and Industrial Development

Objective: To overcome technological backwardness and stimulate industrial growth.

Strategies:

• Investing in research and development.
• Encouraging foreign investment in technology-intensive sectors.
• Promoting education and training in science and technology.

DILEMMA: AGRICULTURE VERSUS INDUSTRIALIZATION

The post-independence era of India saw the policymakers at a critical crossroads: choosing between agriculture and industrialization as the primary economic driving force. The decision heavily leaned towards industrialization, which, at first glance, seemed contrary to the nation’s available resource base and prerequisites. This choice can be scrutinized under several headings, revealing the complexities and considerations behind this pivotal decision.

Industry as the Chosen Path

The government’s choice of industry over agriculture as the economic linchpin was marked by several challenges:

• Resource Constraints: India, at the time, lacked the foundational elements typically required for an industrial boom, such as advanced infrastructure, technology, and investment.
• Infrastructure Limitations: A glaring deficit in the infrastructure necessary to support industrial growth was evident. The country had a limited infrastructure setup, which is crucial for the smooth operation of industries.
• Slow Growth in Key Industries: Vital sectors like iron and steel, cement, coal, crude oil, oil refining, and electricity exhibited a sluggish growth pace, reflecting the nascent stage of India’s industrial development.
• Investment Shortfalls: There was a pronounced lack of investment opportunities, with both government and private sectors hesitating to funnel capital into industrial ventures.
• Technological Gaps: The absence of requisite technology and a lack of research and development efforts stymied the industrialization process.
• Human Resource Issues: A shortage of skilled and semi-skilled manpower, coupled with a low entrepreneurship spirit among the population, posed significant hurdles.
• Market Accessibility: There was diminished access to markets for industrial goods, further complicating the industrial growth narrative.

Despite these hurdles, the government’s inclination towards industrialization was motivated by the broader vision of transforming India into a modern, industrialized nation, breaking free from the colonial legacy of being a mere supplier of raw materials.

Agriculture: The Road Not Taken

Agriculture presented itself as a logical choice for India’s Prime Moving Force (PMF) due to several favorable factors:

• Rich Natural Resources: India was endowed with fertile land that was highly suitable for diverse agricultural practices.
• Human Capital: The agricultural sector did not demand high levels of training, making the vast pool of human capital readily employable.
• Potential for Development: With appropriate reforms in land ownership, irrigation, and agricultural inputs, there was a significant scope for development within the agricultural sector.
• Poverty Alleviation: Agriculture, being the mainstay for a majority of the Indian populace, had the potential to increase purchasing power and reduce poverty through remunerative incomes.
• Support for Industrialization: A thriving agricultural sector could have provided a robust foundation for industrial growth by enhancing the purchasing power of the populace, which in turn would fuel the demand for industrial goods.

ACHIEVEMENTS AND SUCCESS OF INDIAN PLANNING

Increase in National Income and Per Capita Income

• Historical Perspective: Between 1901 and 1947, India’s national income saw an average annual increase of 1.2%. This period is significant as it pre-dates the formal planning era in India, providing a baseline for comparing the impacts of planned economic interventions post-independence.
• Modern Figures: In the financial year 2018-19, per capita income at current prices was projected to reach approximately $1,26,406 annually or $10,533.83 monthly, highlighting a substantial increase over historical figures.
• Economic Growth and Positioning: The significant rise in national income is a testament to India’s economic growth, elevating the country to one of Asia’s emerging economies and positioning it as the fifth-largest economy globally by 2022, surpassing the United Kingdom.

Employment Creation

• Strategic Focus: The planning era emphasized generating employment opportunities through various avenues such as:
  • Establishment of small and cottage industries.
  • Expansion of technical education.
  • Development of self-employment schemes.
  • Establishment of larger industries.
  • Improvement of agriculture and service sectors.
• Objective: These initiatives aimed at not only reducing unemployment but also at enhancing the economic self-sufficiency of the population.

Development of Science and Technology

• Advancements: India has made remarkable progress in science and technology, contributing significantly to its socio-economic development.
• Global Ranking: India ranks third in terms of GDP when adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP), indicating the significant role of technological advancements in its economic stature.

Improvement in Social Indicators

• Key Indicators: There have been notable improvements in various social indicators such as Infant Mortality Rate (IMR), Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR), literacy rates, employment, and remittances.
• Economic Stability and Social Welfare: These improvements are indicative of the broader goals of economic planning, aiming at both economic stability and enhanced social welfare.

Price Stability

• Major Objective: Economic planning has consistently aimed at achieving economic stability, with a particular focus on maintaining price stability, which is crucial for sustainable economic growth.

Industrial Growth

• Core Sectors: There has been robust growth in industries and core sectors such as cement, fertilizers, steel, pharmaceuticals, etc., reflecting the successful implementation of industrial policies.

Agriculture Growth

• Production and Export: Significant growth in the agriculture sector, marked by increased production and export of key commodities like rice, wheat, and sugar, has been a cornerstone of India’s economic development strategy.

Global Leadership in Service Sectors

• Sectoral Success: India has established global leadership in service sectors, including tourism and information technology (IT), showcasing its competitive advantage in these areas.

Opportunities: Poverty Reduction and Employment

• Socio-economic Impact: The planning periods have seen a decrease in poverty levels and an increase in employment opportunities, contributing to the overall socio-economic development of the country.

Development of Transport and Communication

• Infrastructure Focus: Significant emphasis has been placed on the development of transport and communication infrastructure, facilitating economic activities and integration within the country and with the global economy.

Social Welfare

• Five-Year Plans: The implementation of five-year plans has played a pivotal role in allocating resources towards education, health, labor welfare, and upliftment schemes for backward classes, contributing to the compounding effect in development.

Capital Formation

• Economic Foundation: The development across agriculture, industry, and defense sectors has led to an increased rate of capital formation in India, laying a solid foundation for sustained economic growth and development.

FAILURES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF INDIAN PLANNING

Indian economic planning, primarily through its five-year plans, aimed at achieving various socioeconomic goals, including growth, price stability, employment, and equitable distribution of income.

Price Stability

• Issue: Contrary to the goal of maintaining price stability, almost all five-year plans have witnessed a considerable rise in price levels, undermining economic stability and eroding the purchasing power of the common man.
• Details: While the first plan saw a decrease in price levels, subsequent plans failed to control inflation, leading to a steep rise in prices.

Unemployment

• Issue: Despite targeted efforts, unemployment rates continued to increase during the planning periods, indicating a mismatch between economic growth strategies and job creation.
• Details: At the end of the first five-year plan, the country had 53 lakh unemployed individuals, a number that has only grown over the years.

Neglect of Agriculture

• Issue: Except for the first five-year plan, there was a significant neglect of the agricultural sector, critical for the economy and livelihoods.
• Details: The share of agriculture in GDP declined from about 50% in 1950-51 to around 19.9% in 2022, highlighting the reduced focus and investment in this sector.

Slow Growth in the Production Sector

• Issue: The plans favored capital-intensive industries over small-scale and rural industries, leading to slow growth in the broader production sector.
• Details: Additionally, the green revolution, though beneficial, remained limited to wheat and rice, failing to diversify agricultural production.

Inequality in Income and Wealth Distribution

• Issue: One of the main objectives was to reduce inequalities, but the plans witnessed an increase in inequality, affecting both industrial and agricultural sectors.
• Details: The failure to address this issue has led to a concentration of wealth and income, undermining social and economic equity.

Widespread Poverty

• Issue: Inability to effectively combat unemployment has resulted in pervasive poverty across the country.
• Details: The failure to address poverty directly in the initial plans led to its entrenchment, with subsequent plans struggling to make a significant impact.

Inefficient Administration

• Issue: Despite extensive planning and deliberation, the objectives were often not met due to inefficient administration, dishonesty, and bureaucracy.
• Details: These systemic issues have hindered the effective implementation of plans and achievement of their goals.

Lack of a Strong Economic Foundation

• Issue: After twelve five-year plans, the economic foundation of the country remains weak, with agriculture still highly dependent on weather conditions.
• Details: This vulnerability underscores the failure to build a resilient and diversified economic base.

Political Instability

• Issue: Political instability and inefficient administration have been major obstacles to the successful implementation of plans.
• Details: Frequent changes in government and policy direction have disrupted continuity and focus in economic planning.

Over-Ambitious Targets

• Issue: The plans have been criticized for setting overly ambitious targets, unachievable within the stipulated timeframes and available resources.
• Details: Factors such as resource shortages and faulty implementation mechanisms have compounded this issue.

Standard of Living

• Issue: Despite the goal to improve the standard of living, basic necessities remain out of reach for a significant portion of the population.
• Details: The per capita availability of food falls short of the required daily calorie intake, highlighting the gap in achieving this objective.

Research and Development (R&D)

• Issue: Investment in R&D is low compared to other developing countries in Asia and globally, limiting innovation and growth.
• Details: With less than 1% of GDP allocated to R&D, India lags behind in fostering a culture of innovation and technological advancement.

NEHRU-MAHALANOBIS MODEL OF GROWTH

The Nehru-Mahalanobis Model of Growth is a significant concept in the economic history of India, marking a turning point in the country’s planning strategy during its early years of independence. This model was central to the Second Five-Year Plan (1956-61), reflecting the economic policies and development strategies adopted by India during that period. It aimed at transforming India’s agrarian economy into an industrial powerhouse through a series of systematic investments in capital goods and the development of industries. The model is named after Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, who envisioned the strategy, and P.C. Mahalanobis, a renowned Indian statistician and economist, who designed it.

Components of the Nehru-Mahalanobis Model

Investment in Capital Goods

• Premise: The model was based on the idea that a focused investment in capital goods (such as machinery, tools, and infrastructure essential for industrial production) would catalyze economic growth. This investment was intended to increase the production capacity of the economy, thereby enabling higher growth rates.
• Implementation: To achieve this, the model proposed significant state intervention in the economy, with the government directing resources towards the establishment and expansion of heavy industries and infrastructure projects.

Development of Small-Scale Industries

• Objective: Alongside the focus on heavy industries, the Nehru-Mahalanobis model emphasized the importance of small-scale industries. The rationale was twofold: firstly, to generate employment opportunities and alleviate poverty; and secondly, to enhance exports.
• Strategy: By promoting small-scale industries, the plan aimed to diversify the industrial base and create a balanced industrial structure that could meet the needs of the domestic market while also contributing to export growth.

Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI)

• Policy Measures: Import substitution policies were a cornerstone of the Nehru-Mahalanobis model. The government implemented protective barriers, such as tariffs and quotas, to shield Indian industries from foreign competition.
• Goals: The objective was to encourage the domestic production of goods that were previously imported, thereby reducing the dependence on foreign products. This approach was expected to foster the development of a self-reliant economy, capable of producing a wide range of goods for domestic consumption.

Emphasis on Production for Domestic Consumption

• Balanced Industrial Growth: The model stressed the importance of developing industries capable of producing goods to satisfy domestic consumer demands. This involved not only the establishment of heavy industries but also the growth and enhancement of small-scale industries.
• Economic Self-sufficiency: By focusing on domestic production, the strategy aimed to achieve economic self-sufficiency, reducing the need for imports and thereby conserving foreign exchange reserves.

Outcomes and Critiques

The Nehru-Mahalanobis model had a profound impact on India’s economic development, leading to the establishment of a substantial industrial base and the development of key sectors such as steel, heavy engineering, and energy. However, it also faced criticism for neglecting the agricultural sector, leading to imbalances in the economy, and for its emphasis on heavy industries which sometimes led to inefficiencies and slow growth in consumer goods sectors. Despite these critiques, the Nehru-Mahalanobis model laid the foundation for India’s industrialization efforts and played a crucial role in shaping the country’s economic policy direction in the post-independence era.

INDIA’S 5-YEAR PLANS

India’s Five-Year Plans are a series of national economic development initiatives that aimed to enhance the country’s economic performance and address various social issues.

Top of Form

UPSC PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTIONS

1.  With reference to India’s Five-Year Plans, which of the following statements is/are correct? (2019)

1.  From the Second Five-Year Plan, there was a determined thrust towards the substitution of basic and capital goods industries.
2.  The Fourth Five-Year Plan adopted the objective of correcting the earlier trend of increased concentration of wealth and economic power.
3.  In the Fifth Five-Year Plan, for the first time, the financial sector was included as an integral part of the Plan.

Select the correct answer using the code given below.

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 only
(c) 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

2.  The main objective of the 12th Five-Year Plan is ________ (2014)

1.  Inclusive growth and poverty reduction.
2.   Inclusive and sustainable growth
3.  Sustainable and inclusive growth to reduce unemployment
4.  Faster, sustainable and more inclusive growth.

NITI AAYOG

NITI Aayog, which stands for the National Institution for Transforming India, is a pivotal policy think tank of the Government of India, established with the aim of achieving sustainable development goals through cooperative federalism. This institution came into existence in 2015, replacing the Planning Commission, an earlier body responsible for the economic planning of the country. The transformation was aimed at making the policy framework more relevant to the contemporary economic context and challenges.

Governing Structure

The Governing Council of NITI Aayog is chaired by the Prime Minister of India and includes the Chief Ministers of all states and Union Territories with legislatures, as well as the Lieutenant Governors of other Union Territories. This structure is indicative of its inclusive approach to governance, engaging directly with state and local government leaders to ensure their participation in national development strategies.

Functions of NITI Aayog

NITI Aayog has been entrusted with a wide range of functions, which include:

• Visionary Leadership: Setting a national development agenda in sync with economic growth, prioritizing sectors of national importance, and fostering state participation in achieving these goals.
• Enhancing Cooperative Federalism: Promoting both cooperative and competitive federalism by supporting states, thereby strengthening the nation.
• Economic Policy Integration: Ensuring economic policies are aligned with national security interests.
• Inclusive Planning: Paying special attention to marginalized communities to ensure they are included in the planning process.
• Policy Design and Monitoring: Formulating strategic policies, monitoring their effectiveness, and implementing development agendas.
• Cross-Sectoral Resolution: Providing a platform for resolving cross-sectoral and departmental issues to accelerate development objectives.
• Resource Monitoring: Actively overseeing resource requirements across sectors to enhance efficiency and timely program delivery.
• Educational and Research Hub: Serving as a think tank that offers cutting-edge research on governance, best practices for sustainable development, and maintaining a comprehensive resource center.

Pillars of NITI Aayog

The framework of NITI Aayog is built upon several foundational pillars:

• Cooperative and Competitive Federalism
• Pro-people, Proactivity, and Transparency
• Equality and Inclusion of All
• Women Empowerment

These pillars underscore the institution’s commitment to fostering an inclusive, transparent, and competitive environment that supports sustainable and equitable development across the nation.

Key Initiatives

NITI Aayog has launched several initiatives aimed at driving innovation, economic growth, and social welfare, such as:

• India Innovation Index: Ranking states based on their innovation capabilities.
• Atal Innovation Mission: Promoting a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship.
• e-AMRIT Portal: Focusing on electric mobility solutions.
• Aspirational District Programme: Transforming districts with significant improvement potential.
• School Education Quality Index: Measuring the quality of school education.
• SDG India Index: Tracking progress on Sustainable Development Goals.
• District Hospital Index, Women Transforming India Award, Strategy for New India @75, Good Governance Index, and Women Entrepreneurship Programme (WEP): Various programs targeting health, governance, gender equality, and entrepreneurship.

NITI Aayog Vs Planning Commission

The transition from the Planning Commission to NITI Aayog marks a significant shift in India’s approach to development planning and governance.

Similarities

• Primary Motive: Both entities are driven by the overarching goal of national development.
• Constitutional Mandate: Neither body is constitutionally mandated, thereby not being directly accountable to Parliament.
• Planning Tenure: Both envisaged long-term planning, generally spanning 5-7 years.
• Meeting Frequency: Annually convened meetings to deliberate and craft plans.

Criticism of NITI Aayog

• Transformation Limitations: NITI Aayog faces challenges in transforming India into a modern, equitable economy.
• Limited Role in Policy Making: Its influence on major policy decisions and investments is seen as minimal.
• Infancy Stage: Still determining its optimal role as a think-tank.
• Non-critical Nature: Critiqued for not maintaining an intellectual distance from government policies.
• Limited Accountability: Its capacity to address systemic issues like the high percentage of informal labor is questioned.
• Gender Empowerment: Has not significantly impacted the declining women’s labor-force participation.

Way Forward

• Timely Execution: Emphasizing dedicated periods for task completion to ensure efficiency.
• Accountability in Bureaucracy: Addressing bureaucratic inertia through clear accountability mechanisms.
• Governance and Service Delivery: Leveraging its position to foster better governance and public service innovations.
• Decentralization: Advocating for planning that integrates all government levels, enhancing democratic participation.
• Collaborative Implementation: Focusing on strategies for cooperative implementation of plans among various stakeholders.

NITI Aayog’s evolution from the Planning Commission represents an attempt to modernize and democratize India’s planning process. However, realizing its full potential requires addressing the criticisms and suggestions outlined, emphasizing collaboration, accountability, and inclusive governance.

UPSC PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTIONS

1.  With reference to India’s Five-Year Plans, which of the following statements is/are correct? (2019)

1.  From the Second Five-Year Plan, there was a determined thrust towards the substitution of basic and capital goods industries.
2.  The Fourth Five-Year Plan adopted the objective of correcting the earlier trend of increased concentration of wealth and economic power.
3.  In the Fifth Five-Year Plan, for the first time, the financial sector was included as an integral part of the Plan.

Select the correct answer using the code given below.

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 only
(c) 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

2.  The main objective of the 12th Five-Year Plan is ________(2014)

(a) Inclusive growth and poverty reduction.
(b) Inclusive and sustainable growth
(c) Sustainable and inclusive growth to reduce unemployment
(d) Faster, sustainable and more inclusive growth.

3.  How are the principles followed by the NITI Aayog different from those followed by the erstwhile Planning Commission in India? (2018).