CENTRE DEFENDS FACT-CHECK UNIT
Why in the news?
- The Union government defended its fact-checking unit (FCU) in the Bombay High Court, asserting that ensuring accurate information is as crucial as freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a).
- The defence comes amidst challenges to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2023, which allow the FCU to address misleading online content related to the Central Government.
source:Solutionbuggy
Government’s Argument
- Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta defended the FCU as necessary for tackling false information, similar to private fact-checking units.
- The government dismissed “chilling effect” claims, stating that intermediaries and courts, not just the government, make final decisions on misinformation.
Petitioners’ Concerns
- Petitioners argue the new rules breach natural justice and give excessive control to the government over online content.
- They claim the rules are vague and threaten freedom of expression by potentially allowing disproportionate government influence.
Understanding Article 19
Associated Article: |