• UGI USER
  • May 01, 2024
  • 11 Likes
  • 0 Comments

SC REBUKES UTTARAKHAND LICENSING AUTHORITY FOR TARDY ACTION IN PATANJALI CASE

Why in the news?

SC criticises Uttarakhand Licensing Authority for delaying action against Patanjali; revokes licences only after court intervention.

About the SC Criticises Uttarakhand Licensing Authority in Patanjali Case:

  • The Supreme Court censures Uttarakhand’s Licensing Authority for revoking 14 licences of Divya Pharmacy post-court intervention, citing repeated violations under the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act.
  • Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah express dissatisfaction, noting the authority’s swift action only after court orders. The authority’s belated response to violations over six years draws criticism.
source:slideserve
What is Section 159(1) in The Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945?

  • Rule Provision: Section 159(1) of The Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.
  • Authority’s Power: Allows the licensing authority to cancel or suspend a licence after giving the licensee an opportunity to show cause.
  • Reasons for Action: Action can be taken if the licensee fails to comply with licence conditions, the Act, or related rules.